We're going Inception style here, as I do a commentary on an article that is, in part, a commentary on a third article. The article's author Nick Rynerson thinks that Dan Savage, an outspoken LGBT activist and gay father, makes a pro-family (code for anti-LGBT) statement by being married and raising children with his partner. Rynerson argues that in doing so, Savage shows that God has stamped an innate desire in everyone to trend towards a "covenantal" family structure.
Amazing. I don't even know where to begin. Seriously.
I guess the first part that jumps out at me is how Rynerson seems completely unaware that Savage is an outspoken proponent of polyamory, which throws his entire argument out the window. Savage's heart isn't innately stamped to try and emulate anything. And hell, if Savage really were trying to get as close to the lofty institution of heterosexual marriage as he could, he and his partner would probably be divorced and fighting a bitter custody battle over the kids by now.
I also particularly enjoyed how the author condescendingly paints LGBT individuals as a bunch of sinners cutely trying to imitate their superior heterosexual counterparts. (Because, despite his family, Savage is still an awful human being that no one should listen to. That point is made repeatedly.)
But Rynerson accidentally makes a good point overall, one I felt necessary to highlight in the comments. Given his revelation that many LGBT individuals are raising children with their partner in stable homes, one wonders how religious people like him can continue to comdemn marriage equality. After all, one would think they'd want those children to be afforded all the financial benefits of their heterosexually-parented counterparts, right?
(Answer: Wrong. Being "pro-family" isn't about doing what's best for children. It's about hating gays.)